|  You are not logged in.  |  ( Log In or Register )  |
IMAGE UPLOAD | NY Time: Tue, Sep-07, 12:37:47 am | BD | BP | CR | ND | PB | WM

Wall Street Bear Discussion Board »» Here is I think the reason for the $42.22, it is the par value of a dollar
Here is I think the reason for the $42.22, it is the par value of a dollar
wrs - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:44 PM

The dollar is at par, currently worth .0237 oz of gold based on gold carried at $42.22/oz. I think that was the last valuation put on gold before Nixon repudiated Bretton Woods. It is the FRN that is called elastic money and it takes about $1000 FRN's to buy an ounce of gold which makes the FRN worth about 1/24th of a par value dollar.

When you write a check you write it for a $ amount. However, the check isn't for payment in $ because a FRN isn't a $. When you endorse the check, you agree that your check is equivalent in value to xxx $, even though it's not $, it's just FR Credit money (elastic money).

I know that it states in one of my Fed books, the US was supposed to have at least 25% backing for the dollar in gold. Now that is impossible but it was apparently the law back in the 60s when Bretton Woods was still operational.

|  Return to Board Index  |

Threaded Posts In This Topic Read All Posts

OMG this is an incredible find, Rasputin. Many thanks!
FiduciaryBear - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:14 PM
They wouldn't be nearly as bankrupt if they would...
Rasputin - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:32 PM
Here is I think the reason for the $42.22, it is the par value of a dollar
wrs - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:44 PM
Yes, I had noticed that too
wrs - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:18 PM
Yes, WRS, and thus began the slippery slope...
Rasputin - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 05:50 PM
Re: Yes, I had noticed that too
remember - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 06:12 PM
Thanks, Remember. Now it's even more curious.
Rasputin - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 06:23 PM
Which brings up another interesting point...
Rasputin - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 06:30 PM
Heh, if ten million people each bought 25 Gold Eagles...
Rasputin - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 06:46 PM
Been `temporary' for about a year now! LOL! [ NT ]
P2 Lodge - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 06:48 PM
I sense the situation is unravelling - OCICBW [ NT ]
FiduciaryBear - Sun, Sep 13, 2009 - 07:21 PM
I remember reading through FED docs in 2006
meg-abear - Mon, Sep 14, 2009 - 08:24 AM

1 Post Displayed.      Page created in 0.105635 seconds (Total Queries: 3)
Powered by LightningBoard v1.1 (Beta) copyright © 2003-2004 Gene Brott. All rights reserved.
All postings copyright © 2003-2004 WallStreet Bear.